Contrition

I dreamed of you last night. In the first place, we were at my home in my northern town, in the back yard. I was barefoot, and the grass was itchy and warm beneath my soles. I took you across the yard to the sandbox, and told you about the night my father built it. After I’d gone to bed, he dug out the sandbox, built the frame with four little seats, and filled it with cool sand. I told you about how he’d sneaked into my room and lifted me from my bed. He carried me, still half asleep, out to the yard and he’d set me in the sand. “Happy Birthday,” he had said, and I’d yawned and stretched my toes into the sand. My mind was still half in a dream, but I realised eventually where I was. It wasn’t so amazing to me that Da built me a sandbox, because my father could do anything. He could build anything. He knew everything. But it was then, and to date still is, the best birthday gift ever.

You asked me how deep the sand went, and I told you the pit Da had dug was twelve feet deep. That’s certainly how it seemed when I was wee. My house in the northern town last night was cloaked in shadows, unless I wanted it to be sunny. Which I did sometimes. When I was showing you the raspberry bushes and the tree I used to climb to read books in.

We got in the car afterward, and headed to the lake. I showed you my friends’ cabin, where I had spent many spring and summer weekends. On the way back to the city, the highway became a video game. I was driving in Tron. You were there in the passenger seat, teasing me. I ran my fingers through your hair and told you again how much I love your voice. You closed your eyes and laughed, low in your throat.

You drove for a little while, after I avoided (narrowly) a collision with a bladed weapon made of light. Your driving was solid, but uninspired.

You weren’t interested in opening the throttle, and you weren’t interested in passing on the inside. But I was tired. I’d been driving for so long. We knew we’d be a long time on the road, even though the drive to the lake had taken no time at all. We’d been driving my old green station wagon on the way to the lake. On the way back, we had a light vehicle. It went fast, but the radio reception was crap.

While I sat in the seat beside you, I learned that one of my dreads was coming out. You hadn’t brought a comb with you, so I couldn’t take it out and start over with it. I felt like a failure. You didn’t understand my distress. You didn’t understand my sadness. You said “you see; I was right about your dreads after all.”

I told you to stop the car, to pull over because your driving wouldn’t get us anywhere. You were confused; we had been getting on so well.

I was angry. This probably accounted for my insistence on pushing the vehicle as hard as I could. You were nervous. I sat in the driver’s seat and listened to you ask me over and over what was wrong. Finally, you threw your hands in the air, and they dropped heavily to your knees. “Fine.” You said. “You’re angry. I get that. I don’t know why you’re angry, exactly, but I’m sorry for whatever it was that I did that upset you. Okay?”

But it wasn’t okay. Because making contrition for something you cannot name is not proper contrition. If you do not know what the wrong was that you committed, how can it possibly cause you to feel soul-crushed? Had you said “I’m sorry you are upset”, it might have gone better for you. But you didn’t, and I tore apart your act of contrition. Predictably, this made you angry.

You sat beside me, your arms crossed over your chest. “Fine,” you said. “There’s nothing I can say here that’s going to make this better, is there?” You asked. Your eyes were fixed on the track ahead of us.

“Of course there is. But you won’t say it because you don’t know why what you’ve said is hurtful. That’s the greater problem. You think you know me, but you don’t. You put me in this image of who you think I am…of who you want me to be. But I am not that person.”

“Then tell me what it is that I said that was hurtful, and I will apologise for it,” you said. You were frustrated.

“You said perhaps it was a good sign that you were right about my hair, that one of my dreads coming out just meant that you were right.”

“I was just trying to be funny.”

“You don’t remember what you said when I first put my dreads in, do you? What you would then be ‘right about’ now?” I asked.

“No, I admit, I don’t remember exactly what I said,” you said.

“You told me that you didn’t like dreadlocks on anyone, and that I would be less attractive, but that you would love me anyway.”

“I was only telling you the truth,” you said.

“Well, your honesty is what’s hurtful. Knowing you don’t find me attractive makes me wonder why you’re here at all.”

You sighed heavily and closed your eyes. “I do find you attractive. I think you’re fucking beautiful.”

“I’m saying that your telling me you find me less attractive hurts my feelings.”

“I was actually referring to when I said that your hair probably just does what it wants to do anyway.”

I thought about that for a while. “This is a proper apology,” I told you then. “In the actual definition of what an ‘apology’ is, that being a defense of a statement. In this case, I accept your apology, and contrition is not required. I am, however, still distressed that one of my dreads has come out.”

You said nothing for the duration of our drive, but I did win the race, as our vehicle was not only first across the finishing line, but was also the only one that survived.

Share
Posted in dreams | Tagged | 2 Comments

Fionnlach

Madeline stops dead in her tracks when she opens the door. The man in the doorway is tall, strong-built, with wire-rim glasses and a shaved head. He carries a case of beer under one arm. Madeline’s mouth is still hanging open as he pushes past her into the basement suite Madeline has managed to find just this week. She’s been couch-surfing since Cameron kicked her out two months ago. A hissing sound fills the heavy air between them as Fionnlach Fury opens a can of beer. This kicks Madeline into gear.

“Judas priest,” she says quietly, kicking the door closed with her heel and not taking her eyes off of him.

“Madeline Fury,” he grins.

“What the hell are you doing here?”

He points to the letter he’s tossed on the coffee table. “Ye’re a bit of a handful, it seems,” he says, taking a long draught of the beer.

She snatches the letter and her face reddens, then darkens as she skims it. “He STILL doesn’t fucking get it,” she growls, the paper crumpling as her hand balls into a fist.

Lee rests the beer can on one army-surplus-clad knee and lights a cigarette he’s plucked from a pack in the breast pocket of his shirt. Smoke curls up above his head and he squints an eye. “No?”

“No.”

“How the fuck did he find me?” Lee asks.

“He’s very fucking resourceful,” Madeline grunts, dropping the crumpled paper back on the table.

“He’s worried.”

“He has no right to worry,” Madeline says, turning her face away.

This makes Lee sit up. “Mads?” He asks, a note of concern in his voice. Madeline doesn’t answer him, but she shakes her head. Lee is on his feet and at her side in a blink. “Mads? What? Madeline?” He places his calloused hands on her shoulders and turns her to face him, although her head is hung. “Jesus, Madeline, are you…are you *crying*?”

Madeline clutches her left shoulder with her right hand and tries to hide in her forearm, but Lee takes her by both hands and crouches down in front of her, looking up into her face.

“Madeline, Madeline, what have they done to you?” He whispers, then stands and pulls her into a tight embrace, stroking the back of her head as sobs wrack her body. “Our indefatigable Madeline. Our patron saint of shut the fuck up. Our lady of say your piece and be done with it. What have they done to you?”

Continue reading

Share
Posted in gaming, LARP, Stories | Tagged , | Leave a comment

I am tired of arguing.

I am not interested in hearing opposing points of view.

I don’t particularly care about honouring different opinions.

This, then, marks the very beginning of the “Old Fart” stage.

I’m not the sort of person, and never have been, really, whose mind will be changed based on whatever argument is brought to the table. The way I form my opinions (and, therefore, the way I change my mind about something) is by studying, by looking at it from many different angles. From reading and researching.

Sure, we can say that debate is simply the presentation of ideas of differing points of view, and that what better way is there to provide different angles than through debate?

Here’s what I don’t like about it: it seems to me that the way most people argue or debate is by putting opposing arguments/viewpoints down. By trying to undermine them. Rather than just presenting well-supported information, there is this need to ridicule the other side’s facts, logic, or presentation. And that gets us nowhere.

This is why I don’t discuss religion any more…at least not in public fora. I am disgusted when people ridicule a belief system, whether that belief system is one to which I adhere or not. It makes me angry when you can’t take a step back and see that you are using the exact same argument as the people against whom you argue, in order to try to prove them wrong. Regardless of which side you come at the topic from.

There is a difference between discussing something and debating it, and if we can’t talk about something without establishing that you are arguing X and I am arguing Y and now we have to fight about the thing until one of us relents and either calls in to question a definition of terms or semantics, or simply walks away from the discussion, I’m just not interested. There are some things about which I do not need to be ‘enlightened’. There are some things about which I do not need to be ‘educated’. Okay, actually, that’s not true. I think we all need to be educated about everything, but if I think I need a teacher, I’ll go find one. By and large, I don’t want you to lecture me. I don’t want you to point out all the myriad ways in which I am utterly, and completely, wrong.

I am wrong an awful lot. This is a fact. Sometimes, I even admit when I’m wrong. I believe it has happened at least seven times. Maybe four. Let’s agree on once or twice. The difference between the number of times I am wrong and the number of times I *admit* my errors is a vast chasm that cannot be forded by mere mathematicians. Not even mathematicians with several University degrees, a team of Sherpas, some rock-climbing gear, and a theoretical physicist.

But nobody likes it when you point out how wrong they are. Well, perhaps *some* people do. But that’s some kind of kinky fetish that probably involves spiked heels and electrical tape. Not that there’s anything *wrong* with that. I’m not judging.

But I *do* judge. We *all* judge. We are by our very nature judgemental creatures. Which is to say, we are discerning. Discriminatory. We have to be. Because at its core, all ‘discrimination’ means is ‘differentiate’. Recognising differences. In order to make a decision between two (or more) things, we must first be able to discern differences between them. We have evolved as a species because we are able to discern the differences between the tasty berries and the berries that give you the galloping trots (or worse). Because we are able to discriminate between easy, foraging prey and toothy, growly prey with pointy bits. Because we are able to suss out which crops will grow better in which areas or climates.

The root of the word “discriminate” is synonymous with “division” or “separation”, and it’s derived from a word which means, essentially, to distinguish or to perceive. “Discern” comes from the same word form.

MY POINT HERE IS THAT I DO JUDGE. WE ALL DO. Judgement isn’t always a bad thing. It doesn’t always have to be hurtful. Because it is easier to destroy than to create, because it is easier to be hurtful than it is to be kind, we associate things like discrimination and judgement with bad experiences because most of the time, that has been our experience with them.

How the HELL did I get here from “I don’t want to argue anymore”?

This is why I don’t have an education degree. At the end of class, we all would have learned something, but it sure as hell wouldn’t have been on the syllabus. Probably not even in the curriculum.

*ahem*

We have opinions. Our opinions are based on the judgements we make, which are hopefully based on our life experiences and our education. Hopefully we form our opinions out of kindness and a dedication to making the world a better place, and not on derisive, hateful and hurtful misinformation. You and I may have differing opinions on many, many things. All I am saying is that I don’t want to get drawn into debate on public fora. In some cases, I don’t want to get drawn into debate at all.

So if we’re ‘discussing’ something, and I say “I have to stop talking about this now”, please understand it’s not that I don’t think you have very important and valid points to make. It’s that I have decided that once I start losing my temper because we are no longer discussing something but are instead attacking or putting down one another’s logic, reasoning, or arguments, the conversation will only end poorly. I’m not very fond of being angry, although I am *very* good at it.

And sometimes, I just don’t want to discuss specifics.

Share
Posted in Everything Else Drawer | 8 Comments

Allow Me

Allow me to be quite blunt, and please forgive my language.

mevanoff, either sober up and dry out or shut up. Do you even realise how sad it is that the only real communication you have is spamming/trolling a former lover’s blog with rambling, incoherent nonsense? I know that as you read this, you will laugh. I can hear your laugh, even now.

Just think of what you have lost. Take a look at yourself. Take a good, long look at yourself. You should be ashamed.

I know what you’re trying to do.

You are to be pitied.

Share
Posted in Everything Else Drawer | 2 Comments

Seriously, it doesn’t have to be this difficult

I heard something in passing a few days ago that I didn’t think much of at the time, but the more I thought about it, the more it festered. I heard someone say that women are not permitted to participate in actual combat in the United States military. I thought, ‘no…that’s ridiculous. Who would make a stupid rule like that?’

Turns out, stupid rules like that do exist.

It has only been since 1985 that women have been allowed to serve on submarines. NINETEEN EIGHTY FIVE. I mean, okay, the first time ANYONE served on a submarine was in the early teens of the twentieth century, but NINETEEN EIGHTY FIVE, people. Do you even know how ridiculous that is?

I don’t want to get too sidetracked here on the basic ridiculousness of sexism, because I could just go on mocking folks all day. You know, for a *change*.

Anyway, I’d heard the claims that women cannot match men when it comes to physical exertion and ability. I’d heard the goofy idea that men in the military would be ‘adversely affected’ in seeing a female comrade fall to enemy fire. I’d even heard that womens’ roles are as nurturers; that we need women in order to raise up the next generation (of soldiers, presumably). And that allowing women (and, for that matter, gay folks) would somehow cause military units to crumble with diversity.

In my naïveté, I thought these arguments were just simple smokescreens for basic sexism. And they may well be. But there are people who actually *believe* this crap. That always comes as a surprise to me.

I was sent this article which discusses a recent move in the US military to lift bans on women participating in combat. And something really struck me when I read:

Americans will not tolerate large numbers of women coming home in body bags.

And here it is.

Do you value your sons so little? Are your daughters more worthy than your sons? Because if this is the case, I think you’re doing it wrong. On one hand, the right-wing says that women are content in their subordinate roles as caregivers and mothers. That it’s okay to have special rules for women because they’re just not as capable as men. So on one hand, they *devalue* women. But then they turn around and say, “No no no, you cannot let women get killed in combat. We won’t stand for that.”

So you’re fine with indentured servitude (proscribed roles for women), but you’re not okay with freedom (womens’ right to choose how to serve their country). Gotcha. You know, that’s kind of backward to the way you’re portrayed in the media.

But I want to get back to something here. It’s okay to send dozens of young men home in bags, but you take a step back when there’s a possibility some of those body bags contain uteri? “Well, no”, you’ll say, “ideally we don’t want ANYONE to have to give their life for their country.”

But, in essence, when someone DOES give their life for their country, better it be a young man. I do not see the logic here.

Rick Santorum, who is a raging madman (in fact, I usually refer to him as Rick Sanatorium), claims that the reason it would be a mistake to ALLOW women full participation in the military is because it would be really difficult emotionally for male soldiers to see a female soldier’s life threatened, and that reaction would be distracting from their missions. Because, you know, watching an enemy of the state blow your buddy’s brains out in front of you is fine as long as your buddy is another dude.

More mind-boggling are the comments of one of the people who served on a task force that studied the role of women in the military in 1992. Elaine Donnelly said:

it’s a cultural issue and that Santorum’s concerns are legitimate. The commission voted against sending women in close combat because “that would like being an endorsement of violence against women,” she said.

*FACEPALM*

No, really. Go back and read that again.

You cannot allow women in the military because that means our country supports violence against women. We also support violence against men, but that doesn’t matter because men can take care of themselves. You know, it’s too bad there aren’t people who are opposed to violence. Then maybe we wouldn’t NEED a military.

I feel this is a good time to point out that Ms. Donnelly is the president of the Center for Military Readiness. While I’m sure this is a worthy organisation, I can’t help but imagine it as a bunch of super jumpy people in a high-tech room, all of whom have had WAAY too much coffee. And they all just cop these ninja poses every now and then and shout: “ARE YOU READY? **ARE YOU READY!!!???**”

She (Donnelly) goes on to say:

If a soldier is injured and his support soldier is a woman, “that man dies because she’s not going to be able to meet the physical requirements and it doesn’t matter how brave and courageous she is. … We respect women in the military but when you’re talking about direct ground combat, if you start making diversity the most important factor, then you put lives at risk.”

As my good friend Ferlak pointed out, the army has combat readiness tests, and if you don’t pass those, you don’t get to do frontline combat, period. Regardless, one would assume, of your gender. Trust me, if you were on the front lines with His Nibs and I, which of us would you want dragging your shellshocked arse back behind a tank and out of the line of fire? [Note: you want me.] [Also note: I'm a chick.]

I should just like to point out that I am of the extreme left-wing socialist bent who is opposed to the need for a military period. This doesn’t mean I think there are times when military action isn’t the fastest and most effective way of protecting people against despotic military regimes, genocide, and all sorts of evil acts performed by men and women on one another. I *despise* the taking of human lives, no matter in whose name it is done. But here’s the ticket….I despise the taking of male lives *just as much* as I despise the taking of female lives.

It is no more wrong to hurt a woman than it is to hurt a man.

And this archaic, backward policy that the Pentagon is trying to change (that of women not being permitted to serve in combat roles) needs to go. It needs to recognise the value of *all* lives, regardless of their gender.

Give some more credit to the people who *do* choose to serve in the military (I am certainly not one of them), and in their ability to do their jobs, and to do them well, regardless of their chromosomes.

Also, my American friends, PLEASE don’t elect a nutbar. PLEASE don’t elect Rick Sanatorium. Or Mitt Romney (HIS NAME IS MITT. MITT. HOW CAN YOU, WITH A STRAIGHT FACE, EVEN CONSIDER SAYING “President MITT”?). Or Newt Gingritch. HIS NAME IS NEWT. NEWT. All three of these men are dangerous to freedom, liberty, and, to be honest, common sense. Some of them are dangerous to sanity. In exchange, I will do my very best to try to get Stephen Harper out of office here at home.

Share
Posted in Just Wrong, piss in your eye, Rants | Tagged , , , | 20 Comments

Still Learning

It’s important to keep learning things. Whether those things are new routines or sub-routines, or new choreography, or reading new books, I don’t think it’s the *what* that matters. I think it’s the *doing* that matters. This is important. I may eventually come back to this, but if I don’t, just remember that learning new things is important, no matter how old you are, and no matter how much stuff you think you already know. Because even if there is stuff you think you already know, you probably don’t know it. You might know a lot about it, or a lot of it, but I strongly doubt you know everything there is to know about anything.

…actually, that’s all I know about that.

Share
Posted in Everything Else Drawer | 2 Comments

The Mission

I like to learn things about the place I’m in when I’m travelling. I like to learn a little about its history, its culture. I like to mix business with pleasure when I have to travel for work (but where I work, business IS pleasure, so that’s easy). And when I’m travelling for pleasure, I like to do a bit of work.

I wasn’t really expecting to be assigned a fairly substantial task when I was visiting TUO and R:tAG, though. They were understanding and even offered to help. It wasn’t rocket surgery; I had to go and talk to a fellow who’d been identified as a potential presenter for one of our Professional Development sessions. I felt terrible having to ask R:tAG and TUO to help me out with directions to the fellow’s place, but again, they were accommodating and actually drove me there.

He wasn’t home.

But when we returned to the car which we’d parked a few blocks away, I saw that a Message had been left for us. Mostly for me. Anyone else might have thought that the message left for me on the hood of their car was a joke, but it made me nervous. I made an excuse to jog back to the contact’s house, but instead of knocking again on the front door, I ran around back and hopped the fence. The fellow who lived next door knew what that message meant.

His name is Chris, and he’s an RCMP officer living in California in the winters whenever he can. I told him I was a bit nervous because of the message I’d just recieved, which he asked about. His expression grew tight-lipped when I told him.

“Leave me your hotel keys and I’ll give you a key to my house,” he said, “you don’t fuck around with this kind of stuff.”

R:tAG and TUO were waiting by the car, and I knew I had to tell them what was going on. I pointed at the symbol on their car.
“I know!” R:tAG exclaimed. “Isn’t it cool?”

I stared at him, trying to figure out what to say next.

“It’s not the decepticons who are bent on destruction, R:tAG,” I told him, trying to keep my voice level. “The autobots are going to try to kill me. I can’t explain more now; there isn’t time. We have to get to the coast.”

The great thing about great friends is that sometimes, they just kind of understand that you have to break off your visit early when something big is going down. And this was big. Since their car had been identified, I was able to trade them their car for the one I’d been given when I left for vacation. I didn’t want them involved.

It was a little odd how San Francisco and New Brunswick look exactly the same, but when I pulled over to telephone and check in with my progress, my friend Melistress was able to come and meet me for lunch. We decided to take the afternoon and go to the beach. At one point, she telephoned her husband, and handed me the phone so I could “meet” him. He and I talked for a few minutes, and I encouraged him to come out to the beach with us.

In New Brunswick-cum-San-Franscisco.

Within half an hour, Melistress informed me that her relationship was ending. For the first time that day, I was shocked. I asked what had happened. She said he had been unfaithful. I said that wasn’t possible. She pointed out a bunch of things that might, if you kind of squinted your eyes and stared directly at the sun for a few minutes before looking back at something, be construed as unfaithful.

I took her with me back to Chris’ house, to get a brief update on the case. The house had been tossed; Chris wasn’t anywhere to be found. I sent Melistress out to the arts centre, telling her I’d meet her in a few minutes. I didn’t want her involved in whatever the hell attack was going to come.

Instead of having to get involved in the threat of the autobots, I went back to the beach, where I found Melistress’ beau, beside himself. He spoke with a distinct East coast accent, which made sense as we were in San Francisco, New Brunswick. He told me what had been going on, that he wasn’t stepping out on Melistress, but that he felt lost, and didn’t know how to make her happy. He said he was afraid of losing her and so he’d backed off, trying to give her the space he thought she needed. He said he loves her with all his heart, but just can’t do the things other people do to show their feelings because he doesn’t think that those sorts of things matter. That he works hard to help her raise their family, and that he knows he can’t be everything to her, and that breaks his heart.

I was able to get to the arts centre without encountering the autobots. I’d invited TUO and R:tAG, but they hadn’t yet arrived. It was a dress rehearsal for Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy”, and the patrons were all lying on sleeping bags watching the ceiling. I’m still not sure if there was supposed to have been a laser light show playing on every ceiling surface in the sprawling arts centre or if maybe it was Free Shrooms Day at the symphony, but either way, that was weird.

Melistress and I took our seats in the theatre, and I ate chips through the entire first movment, having forgotten that that sort of thing is incredibly rude.

And that is when the massive battle between His Nibs and The Captain woke me. I hope the auotbots don’t destroy San Francisco.

Share
Posted in dreams | Tagged | 7 Comments

Conflict

When faced with the decision “Do I delete this comment because it’s meaningless”? I always choose not to do so. The only comments I ever delete are ones I don’t approve in the first place because they are spamalicious. But, as you know, from time to time there are comments made on here that are often nonsensical, or just plain weird.

I know who posts them. I know why they’re nonsensical and/or just plain weird.

They’re not really hurting anyone, and I think we can all just kind of agree to ignore them. Sometimes, they’re offensive, but again, they’re not really hurting anyone. I certainly don’t consider it “cyberbullying” (one of the stupidest terms ever coined in the history of coining terms) or harassment. To be honest, I get far more upset at some of the other comments; never at the rubbish comments.

In fact, when I see these posts, I just feel sad. Because I know who the person who posts them used to be. And, perhaps could be again?

Why?

Because I don’t believe in censorship. You have every right to say whatever distasteful, hateful, ridiculous, ill-advised, brilliant, witty, loving, attention-seeking, humble thing you wish to say.

Now, some folks say “Sure, but you, cenobyte, don’t need to publish it.” And/or “You, cenobyte, don’t need to be the vehicle through which it is said.” But if I remove the comments I find distasteful, or the comments I would prefer not to appear on my bournal, have I not just become a censor? It’s not like this bournal is a printed document that I have to edit for brevity.

It isn’t harmful. It isn’t inciting or promoting hatred or violence or illegal acts. It’s just very, very sad. You may have to trust me on this.

On the other hand, these comments often contribute nothing. Sometimes, they do. Usually, they don’t. So if the purpose of this bournal is to foster a back-and-forth communication, these comments are not serving the purpose. But are they HARMING anything? Are they *detrimental*?

The Utilitarian in me says that if they’re not making things better, then they are contributing to worseosity. But the practical side of me (the entire area of which is contained in a one-inch-square spot on my left heel) says nobody really pays attention to them. However, you can see my conundrum.

Do I delete the comments that do not “matter”, and give in to a kind of censorship? Or do I just leave them be, and know that they will, forever more, be beacons of weirdness on my bournal?

Share
Posted in Everything Else Drawer | 3 Comments

O Lamy, my Lamy!

- Remember: No good comes of Walt Whitman –

O Lamy! my Lamy! my lovely pen is gone;
The pen has written every word, the letters sought not done;
The book is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,
While reading eyes the metric verse, the poem grim and daring:
But O heart! heart! heart!
O the dripping drops of ink,
Where in the world my Lamy lies,
Gone in but a blink.

O Lamy! my Lamy! rise up and find your Bell;
Rise up—for you the writ is wrote—for you the music swells;
For you bouquets and ribboned wreaths—for you the shelves a-crowding;
For you I call, the searching jill, my saddened face is turning;
Here Lamy! dear pen!
These words beneath your nib;
Were like some dream that on the page,
And witty little quips.

My Lamy does not answer, it is gone and lost;
My Lamy does not feel my hands, it has not ink nor verse;
The pen is neither safe nor sound, its writing done and terse;
With mournful words, the bookish nerd, comes in with object gone;
Exult, O ballpoints; write, O Bics!
But I, with mournful tears,
Write the words my Lamy wrote,
in pencil, without smears.

Share
Posted in Bad Mojo, poetry, True Stories | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Paddy, my arse

Today, just a single, solitary, lonely link.

Why St. Patrick’s Day pisses me off.

Share
Posted in Everything Else Drawer | 9 Comments