Insane in the Membrane

So, one of the things I love is swimming in lakes. I also love swimming in oceans. I have never tried swimming in a sea, but I’m sure I’d love that too. We’d spent the day kind of at the beach. The boys were all fishing, and the water was so clear that I could point to schools of fish and say “there’s a school of pickerel heading your way; huge jackfish, two o’clock”. I think I even saw a sturgeon, but it’s tough to tell because it was pretty deep in that particular part of the lake. It was as clear as the lake in Prince Caspian; as clear as Thoreau’s Walden Pond. And it was golden in the sun and emerald green out where the sturgeon hid.

And I have to tell you, the guys were awesome. They’d rigged up a rather intricate (for beach-side horsing around) pulley system by which they’d drag us on an inner tube through the water, via an ATV on the grassy shore. We had…a considerable number of collisions. Nobody seemed to mind. I was the only girl there. And in case you’re wondering if the fellows from Duck Dynasty are as awesome in real life as they are on teevee, I’m here to tell you that they most certainly are.

After our day at the lake, we went back to Phil and Miss Kay’s house where everyone was staying for the summer. In the middle of the night, I woke up because I had to go to the loo (owing to all the water I drank at the beach of course, and throughout dinner), but I didn’t want to wake anyone by flushing so I snuck outside to use the biffy in the back. Of COURSE they have a biffy in the back. Have you even ever *watched* that program?

Well at one point, I walked by a tree that was covered in cobwebs. I didn’t really mind; I skirted around it, but by the time I was on my way back, I was in an alley and the tree was in the middle of the alley and there were high, dense caragana bushes to either side of the tree so the only way I could get past it to get back to the house was to duck underneath it. On the one side was a ridiculously enormous spider that kept *looking at me* every time I considered ducking under its web. It looked at me with malicious intent. It was all “go ahead, emmer-effer. Walk under my web. I mean, this spider was GIGANTIC. At LEAST the size of both of my palms put together. And it was sentient. So…

I didn’t want to take my life into my hands, so I examined the other side of the tree. It was covered in cobwebs, but it looked a lot safer, so I blasted through and began brushing the cobwebs off as I walked up the path to the door. Under the orange glow of a sodium lamp, I noticed that bits of the web were still clinging to me. I tried brushing them off, but they moved. It didn’t take long for me to realize I’d walked through the spider’s nest. I was now covered in millions of baby sentient spiders.

Some people would have the wherewithal to somehow strike up a favourable relationship with the spider babies. I, however, began making that half-croaking, half-whining sound you make when your legs are about to turn to jelly. It’s the “I skipped all the preliminary parts of the flight-or-fight response, and now I’m just going to lay down and die” part of your monkey brain fighting with the “eff that noise, I’m'a light myself on fire first” part of the lizard brain. I managed to get into the house, figuring that all I really needed was a scalding hot shower and that would drown the frigging spider babies. I did not feel the least amount of guilt at annihilating millions of sentient life forms, and I thank you for that, Captain James T. Kirk.

But because Willy and Jase Robertson and I had been out drinking the previous night (after the beach)…well…actually, they were the ones drinking. I was just watching their beards…the lavatories in the house were all…occupied. The only one left open was Phil and Miss Kay’s private lavatory. I didn’t want to wake them, and I knew they’d been watching television (I’d seen it through the window out back as I went to the biffy), so I snuck into their master bedroom and into their en suite.

With the lights on, it became apparent that it wasn’t spiders I was covered in, but millions of strange black beetles with hourglass-red markings on their carapices. Yes, I realise that normally that would be a black widow thing, but these were beetles. I could hear the clicking noise their chitin made as they shuffled their wings. And when I brushed at them, they’d fly away and then land on me again. That’s when they started to bite.

I got my shirt off without all of the bugs getting in my hair, and I managed to shimmy out of my shorts and underthings (I don’t know why I was sleeping fully dressed. It was, quite honestly, the weirdest part of my dream). Just before I was about to step into the shower, the door began to open. I leapt behind it and peered around to see Phil Robertson standing there, scowling his scowly scowl.

“I went outside,” I told him, near panic tears. “And walked through a cobweb and now there’s all these beetles, and they’re horrible and…”

He lifted an eyebrow, glanced at my pile of clothes crawling with beetles, and looked back at me.

“Also, I’m naked. I don’t know if you care about that sort of thing. I don’t.”

He half-shrugged, walked over to the counter and opened what I thought was a cupboard. “Get in here,” he said. “I’ll fix this all up.”

I didn’t think it would be prudent to argue with Mr. Phil Robertson, so I ducked inside this cabinet, which turned out to be cramped, but not entirely uncomfortable. The doors were a smoky glass, kind of like a sauna. I heard a popping sound, then a hiss, and the little room began to fill with smoke. Somehow, I could breathe just fine, and I watched as the beetles began to fall off of my body and writhe on the floor. Some had attached themselves to my flesh, and I had to scrape them off with the side of a piece of wood. I pulled out the ones that had attached themselves to my scalp, and to the back of my neck, taking chunks of flesh with them.

I stayed in the smoker box until all of the bugs were dead and off of my body. When I got out, I showered off and asked Phil how to clean the smoker box out. He just shook his head and said, “don’t worry about that, now”, and shooed me out of his room. I headed outside, eager to sit in the sun. And to my surprise, discovered that the Robertson house was situated on a college campus. A college campus with a large Roman stone amphitheatre. A college campus with a large Roman amphitheatre which was currently being used to produce Monty Python’s “King Arthur and the Quest for the Holy Grail”. Through which production I was now walking.

Knowing much of that particular production by heart, I recited some of it with the actors as I made my way across the stage. At the other side, I found my co-worker, and we sat down together to have coffee. She took one look at me and commented on my somewhat harried appearance. This was when my legs began to itch. I leaned down to scratch them and found that the skin was coming off.

Not in little flakes, either. The skin on my legs had been thoroughly cooked in the smoker, and was now crackling like turkey skin and coming away from the dermis beneath. Underneath, my dermis was pink and tender. I crackled the skin and slid my fingers beneath the rough surface to separate it from the new skin. I noticed, however, that the joint around my knee had come apart – not unlike what happens to joints of meat when they are roasted – inside were several pieces of tinfoil shoved into the joint itself, and the meat around the joint was teeming with maggots.

“Oh, hey, look at this,” I said to my co-worker. “My leg is full of maggots and tin foil and my skin’s coming off! Isn’t this cool?”

She did not think it was cool.

Someone’s Sleeping, Lord

We tend to surround ourselves with like-minded thinkers; people who understand, if not agree with our politics, our, as Ignatius J. Reilly would say, “world view”, and our humour. By and large. We have small differences here and there, but for the most part the lion, it is said, does not lay with the lamb. There are a few exceptions to this rule in every social circle, including my own.

So I guess I just don’t understand, on a very basic level, why right wing-nuts seem to think it’s at all insulting to call me (and many of my peeps) ‘granola’, or ‘earth muffin’, or ‘crunchy’. They seem to toss these epithets around like a bunch of jocks coming up with new and crueller ways of insulting fat kids, ugly girls, and geeks. But here’s the difference, at least for me: they’re right.

I *do* eat (and make!) granola. And it’s very good granola! I *am* an earth muffin! I define “earth muffin” as “someone who cares about the future of this planet; someone who believes that human activity has an effect on every ecosystem on this planet; someone who believes that it’s a good idea to continue to study alternate (and additional) forms of energy generation; someone who believes in reducing our dependence on non-renewable resources; someone who believes in conservation of habitat and of species; someone who believes in healing rather than treating symptoms”. And ‘crunchy’? I’m ABSOLUTELY crunchy. That’s because I have bones. Everything with bones is crunchy. And if you think about it, what’s the opposite of crunchy? Smooshy. Marshmallowy. Soft.

I am *perfectly happy* being crunchy, thank you very much.

I am a card-carrying socialist. The leftmost party in this country is not left enough for me. Political leftism scares the shit out of right wing-nuts because they (the right wing-nuts) think socialists want to take all their money and give it away to poor people. And, really, *they’re right*. We don’t mind being accused of the truth. But we go further than that. It’s a complete ruse that socialists are in favour of huge governments and bureaucracies. In fact, you’d be hard-pressed to find a card-carrying socialist who’s all “oooh! Yeah! We need MORE PEOPLE RUNNING THINGS!” What we want is co-operative management of the economy. We want to actually have impact into how governments spend money and how they budget.

In a truly socialist economy, everyone would work for the common good. What’s the common good? Look at a very small scale example. You live in a family, or in a communal house with roommates. If everyone does their share of chores; if everyone shares equitably, by way of bills, groceries, etc., everyone benefits and no one does more than their share. In families, we take care of the very young and the very old, of the infirm and of the ill. All socialists are saying is that we’re all family. All of us. Every human on earth is part of the same family.

I’m not entirely certain why people are so concerned about their money and their stuff. Most folks work their arses off to get more money to get more things. But to what end? To have more things? To leave more things to your kids when you die? At the end of it all, are you going to look back on your life and regret not having had more things, or are you going to look back and regret not spending more time doing the things you love with the people you love? I fundamentally don’t understand people who’d agree with the first part.

And that’s why it’s not an insult to call me ‘crunchy’ or ‘earth muffin’ or ‘birkenstock-wearing’ (I do wear Birks, although I prefer going barefoot), or ‘tree-hugging’ (I only hug trees when I’m *very* drunk), or ‘long-haired’ (I do have long hair, and I don’t shave), or ‘unwashed’ (it’s mean, but it’s also untrue. I wash frequently. With hand-made soap.). It’s hilarious to hear folks use ‘socialist’ or ‘left-wing-nut’ as if they were insults.

You Make the Whole World Go Around

I have to say this.

Because it’s weighing on my mind a lot (pun intended).

Being fat is not funny. I don’t want to be called “Ruebenesque” (even if it’s spelled properly, which it very rarely is) or “curvy”. It’s horrible. I hate it. I hate everything about being fat.

One of many, many, many reasons I hate “Love, Actually” with the burning rage of a thousand angry suns is because such a big deal is made of one of the characters in that movie falling in love with a “fat girl” – a) the actor isn’t fat; b) the message that “people can fall in love with fat people too” makes me fucking livid.

And as much as I love Queen’s Fat Bottomed Girls, it makes me sad.

I’m not lazy. I don’t have bad eating habits. I don’t care what’s worked for you, and I don’t care what your sister’s friend’s husband’s neighbour’s girlfriend said about the fucking paleo/Atkins/blood type/vegan/weight watchers diet. Just. Don’t. Even.

I don’t want to hear about how you prefer big girls. I don’t want to hear about how the media portrays an ideal woman as such-and-such of this and something else of that. It doesn’t matter. Because I’m not talking about anyone other than me. I just hate being fat.

Looking at some photos a few years ago, I was shocked at the fact that I used to have a jawline. It wasn’t even that long ago. I don’t know who it is I saw in those pictures that were taken of me recently. It isn’t me. It can’t be me. That woman was a fat woman.

I don’t want to hear suggestions about how to fix it. I’m not interested in self-help books or daily bloody affirmations.

Yeah, I think I should be eating this. Thanks for asking. Yes, I’ve tried eating five small meals a day. No, I don’t eat very much at any one meal. No thank you, I don’t want seconds. Really. I don’t want seconds. I don’t. Want. Seconds. Yes, I’ve tried intervals. Yes, I’m in the process of talking to doctors. No, I am not an ‘emotional eater’. Yes, I drink enough water. Do you think I don’t hear my own voice telling me not to eat this or to spend 20 more minutes on the treadmill? If I followed my own advice, I’d spend all day at the gym and I’d survive on vegetable juice and fish.

What pisses me off the most is when someone says “you’re not fat” to me. Because, bullshit. I have more chins than a Chinese phonebook. Yes, that’s culturally insensitive. Sorry, Mrs. Chin. When I run, there are parts of me that don’t stop moving for days. When someone says they want dinner rolls, they invite me to sit at the table. Don’t blow smoke up my arse. You’re not fooling anyone, least of all me. And even if you were, when you say that, it means I have to say “is there something wrong with being fat?” And then things have to get Awkward.

Do you have any idea how humiliating it is to sit in some doctor’s office and have to recount, over and over again, how you’ve been tracking your calories, how you’ve been journalling what and when and how much you eat for over a year, how you’ve been going to the gym fairly regularly for two years, how you’re still fat? Do you know how humiliating it is to go to the shops and pull “2XL” off the rack, only to find out it’s nearly bursting at the seams when you try it on? To have the salesperson suggest you take a look over in the corner, where they also stock clothes that weren’t even attractive in the 70s? I suspect this is just as humiliating as going to a shop and pulling an “XXS” off the rack and finding out it looks like you’re draped in a burlap sack. To try to find ‘shapely’ clothes that simply don’t fit because you just weren’t built with curves. To have people tell you that you should really go and eat a sandwich.

Folks assume I overeat, and they assume I’m lazy, and they assume I have a bad diet. Just like they’ll assume that you’re anorexic, that you take diet pills, that you’re obsessed with fashion and trying to “look good” because you’re thin.

I’m not going to go on about ideals and all that bullshit. I’m not going to go in to body acceptance and all that crap. I just wanted to tell you that I assume people who tell me blonde jokes are mouth-breathing idiots (I’m blonde, ftr). And I assume people who try to be funny about fat are also mouth-breathing idiots. Yeah, I’m angry. I’m angry at myself. Because I’ve let myself get like this. Because I’ve judged other people who are fat. Because, God help me, I see the humour in the ‘fat kid’ stories. Because **I can’t stop it**. Because when I hear someone say they think I’m attractive, I know in my heart they are lying. Or mistaken. Or actually talking about someone else. Because I’m not.

I don’t think fat is attractive on me. I will never be a member of the “fat acceptance” movement. I will never “learn to love myself the way I am”. Go ahead and tell me you think that’s sad. Because that really helps. Telling someone it makes you sad because they can’t see their own beauty. Oh? You feel shitty about yourself? Here, have some guilt to top that off because you’re doing yet another thing wrong.

There are far more things about me that are awesome. I don’t need to be “not fat” for those things; they don’t change with my weight. But they also don’t change the fact that I. Am. Fat. And the fact that I hate it. And the fact that I can’t talk about it without making people uncomfortable. It seems like when I talk about this, all y’all feel the need to console me or to try to commiserate or to try to …I dunno. And I get it; we’re pack animals. The way we reinforce our social bonds is through empathy. I appreciate what you’re trying to do. Sometimes, we just need to bitch about stuff without having someone step in and try to fix it (I’m the worst for that. ‘Oh, you have a problem? Look, I know a solution!’). The only thing that’s going to fix this problem is for me to un-fat. And since it doesn’t look like that’s possible, I’m going to have to learn to live with it.

Just like when your best friend dated the trucker who insisted on grabbing her left breast every time they drove past a sign that said “squeeze left”. I mean, the guy was a total dinkwart who thought he was funny, but we all just had to live with him because SHE was “in love”. So maybe I just need to look at the state of my body as something like my best friend’s dinkwart trucker boyfriend. Of course, eventually he dumped her because all she ever wanted to do when they were together was read books and that activity bothered him.

They’re coming to take me away

Okay. Let’s see if I can do this.

Two days before the American gun control bill was introduced for voting, an attack was made by [then] unknown individuals on civilians at the Boston Marathon, arguably one of the biggest, most well-known marathons in North America. For days, in fear, people re-enact a version of the scene from “The Jerk” wherein Navin deduces that a psychopath shooter hates cans (a brilliant bit of movie making, for the record).

Fear does strange things to a person, and being faced with attempted mass murder does funny things to people. So it’s no wonder that organisers of marathons all across the US and Canada were suddenly reassuring their constituents and the media that their events would be safe, and would go ahead as planned. Because the first conclusion it’s natural to jump to is that whoever bombed the Boston Marathon hates marathons. And who wouldn’t really? They’re dirty, nasty things with unreal political ambitions and a strange proclivity for intestinal …oh. That isn’t marathons at all. I don’t know what I was thinking of there, but it wasn’t marathons.

Cue the United States military, police, and para-military operatives going into high gear and ignoring civil liberty in the name of public safety. Of course they had to ensure public safety. How many thousand officers were needed to find and arrest one kid? Lots, that’s how many. They shut down an entire city. This is terrifying. Personally, I find the actions of the police, the FBI, and the military far more frightening than the idea that a couple of disenfranchised kids got their hands on a copy of the Anarchist’s Cookbook and, broken as they were, decided to wreak havoc at a massive public gathering. It’s awful that they murdered people. It’s amazing more people weren’t killed. But don’t for a minute think that the death of an 8-year-old kid is any worse or any better than the death of a 20-something man. Whether that man was a participant of the marathon or whether that man was a suspect in the bombing itself. It doesn’t make murder any more morally “right” when it’s done in the name of one law versus in the name of illness.

[Also, what in the blue fuck does "ethnic Chechen student" mean, Reuters? Has the word "ethnic" now come to mean "anyone who is not white, Christian, and American by birth"? You know what? I don't even know why I ask anymore. I don't. Even. Know.]

But. Can’t get sidetracked here.

Leading up to the vote on gun control legislation, there’s a bunch of madness happening all along the eastern seaboard. People are terrified. People are getting riled up. And we all know the best time to vote on something incendiary is when we’re all already riled up.

So the US government fails to pass pretty common-sense gun control legislation, despite the bill receiving a majority of the votes in its favour. Despite it being popular, according to recent polls, with the majority of Americans. Well-placed dollars on behalf of the anti-gun-control faction did their job. It’s not worth speculating how many of the people who voted against the gun control bill would also be perfectly happy to completely dispense with their civil liberties the way the majority of Boston was.

Within a couple of days, a couple of disenfranchised kids managed to decimate the city of Boston and American civil liberty, using an assault weapon that he probably bought *perfectly legally*, and by detonating homemade bombs. Too bad it wasn’t more difficult for a mentally ill young man to get his hands on assault weapons. REGARDLESS of his ‘ethnicity’. Maybe it wouldn’t have made a difference. Maybe the weapons he used WEREN’T acquired legally. Probably it wasn’t very difficult though, when you can *order assault weapons online*.

That isn’t even the point, though. The point is that right around the time lawmakers were voting down gun registration, TEXAS EXPLODED. Okay, well, it didn’t actually explode. But a fertilizer plant did. A fire of unknown cause at a fertilizer plant in a small Texas town called West caused the anhydrous ammonia tanks to explode with the force of an atom bomb. It registered as a geological event. People nearly 60 miles away felt the blast. That’s huge.

And it happenedĀ at nearly the same time as the gun control bill was overturned. Don’t you see? Using the same logic we used in the Boston case, wherein we deduced that the bombers hated marathons, we can, without a doubt, conclude that God hates people who vote against common sense gun control legislation.

We can also deduce, with a fair amount of certainty, that the kids who bombed the Boston marathon were clearly and obviously NOT white, Christian, American citizens. They HAVE to be ‘other’. And we can also deduce that because they chose to attack a public event close to the time legislators were voting on gun control that the people who voted against gun control were somehow in cahoots with these kids, because that distraction provided every American senator who wasn’t yet convinced that Americans NEED easy access to assault weapons with an excuse to vote against the bill that would make it more difficult for Americans who want guns to get guns so that they can protect their homes and their families against terrorists.

Now the news reporters are saying that the FBI “didn’t see [the Boston Marathon Bombings] coming”; that the elder of the two suspects had been questioned previously by the FBI (and it’s suggested that was done at the request of the Russian government) for allegedly having ties to militant hate groups. But they found no evidence of it. And, if you believe the spin of the media, that is the fault of civil liberties. Because the FBI had to call off their investigation when they didn’t find anything. Which, of course, when you think about it, means that if the FBI had been allowed to continue to investigate the young man without cause, they might have found something.

Here lies the conspiracy theory – the bit about God making West, Texas explode because He was pissed off about the gun legislation thing. It makes about the same amount of sense as a) assuming the people who attacked Boston did so because they hated marathons; b) voting against gun legislation because it should be easier to get guns to protect yourself against people who have easy access to guns.

Also, let me just say that I’m ashamed of the news media. Stop this stupid ‘first past the gate’ style of “reporting” (it isn’t reporting, btw. It’s rumour mongering and gossip unless you have verifiable facts) and try to get to the ‘verifiable facts’ style of news. I don’t care what the people who buy all of the advertising on your station say, it oughtn’t be about ratings and who gets to break the story. It ought to be about who has the most correct, and verifiable facts. Pretend you’re scientists for a while.

Call me Ducky

The Nipper has the Best Ideas Ever Invented. He said, last night on the way to rehearsal, “you know what would be cool, would be if they made a Call of Duty ™ game that’s age-appropriate for kids and they called it Call of Ducky. And you’d play this duck having adventures all over in the meadows and fields and stuff and maybe even a lake. But instead of shooting bullets and guns, they’d spit water out of their mouths. Their eyes wouldn’t turn to Xs when they got hit, because the water doesn’t kill a duck, but their eyes would go all googly and roll around when they got hit and they’d be stunned and then they’d fly away or walk away or whatever.

Then for grenades, they’d poop out eggs, and -”

“Birds don’t poop out eggs, boyo,” I interrupted. “They lay them. Kind of in the same manner a woman births a baby.”

“Okay, so they’d lay eggs and the eggs would be like grenades and they could throw them and they’d break and then the other guy would get all eggy and that’d be really gross. And then THOSE other guys would fly away or wander off because they’d need a bath. Do ducks bath?

“And there could be other kinds of birds instead of airplanes and jets and things.”

The Captain said, “You could have eagles for airplanes.”

“And swans,” The Nipper went on, “for the navy.”

“And some of the birds could drop bombs. You know, like poop bombs. If they’re flyers.”

“They’d go on missions to find some ducklings and rescue them, or to find a new nest…you know what else would be cool would be if you started out as, like, an egg. With just feet sticking out the bottom. And you had to find your way back to the nest and had some kind of sonic attack for if you got in trouble. Then as you go through the game, your stats would improve and you’d eventually break out of the egg and level up.

“But then you’d be a yellow duckling and you’d be all fuzzy and you’d have your sonic peep attack and a scratch attack, because you wouldn’t know how to spit water yet. Then when you levelled up you’d grow proper feathers.

“And you could level up again and learn how to dive in a pond, and you could level up again and learn how to fly.”

So I’m thinking this would be a wicked game for kids to play. So. My gamer peeps, please make this happen. The Nipper would be forever grateful. I’ll help with the writing and editing. I’m very good at “quack, quack, peep peep peep”.

But seriously. This game would rock. And I bet all of the gamer parents out there would buy it for their kids.

I…took the liberty of designing a game case for you:

Call of Ducky

Call of Ducky

Unbelievable

Behind the DM's screen

Behind the DM’s screen

Something ridiculous happened today. Before I get to that, though, I’m'a set some ground rules, because this is the kind of discussion that gets out of hand really, really fast.

1) I’m not interested in any anti-religion comments. What follows did not happen because people believe in God. This isn’t a discussion about belief versus fact, religion versus atheism, etc.. And specifically, please don’t post anti-Christian comments. Think them to yourself if you’d like.

2) I’m not interested in incendiary or antagonistic comments. I’ve heard them all, and they’re not helpful.

This morning, The Captain told me how much he and his friends are enjoying the D&D game I’m running for them. I don’t know if I’ve mentioned how wonderful it is to watch a bunch of 12-13yo kids (and one 8-yo kid) experience traditional tabletop D&D for the first time. I mean, they’re excited and they’re working together and they’re creative and they’re brilliant and I get to watch their own stories and adventures light up their faces and ignite their spirits. You can’t buy that.

It’s incredible when you get to share something you’re passionate about with your kids. His Nibs joined in too because the kids were all over the ranger, halfling rogues, wizard, and dwarf fighter, but nobody wanted to be the cleric. And everybody knows that 0-5th level parties kind of…flounder without a cleric. Here I’m using the word ‘flounder’ to mean ‘die horribly in writhing pits of fire and rotting wraith entrails’.

Most of The Captain’s friends are great. I like them. I like having them at the house (when they get loud, they get booted outside). There are one or two I’d rather not see on a regular basis, but for the most part, the majority of his friends are fly. Heh. I said ‘fly’. Anyhow, I feel a little guilty admitting that there are kids I don’t much like, but where is it written that you have to like every kid you meet? I think that’s ridiculous.

Anyway, so The Captain and his gaming friends are super into the game, which is wicked. And there are more kids in his peer group who are kind of curious and interested to try it out. There are a few who just aren’t interested, and that’s okay too. And there’s one kid who said he’s not allowed to play D&D because “he’s Christian and D&D is the devil’s game”.

So when I heard that I went a little ballistic. I don’t know where and when that stupid moniker was coined, but I suspect it was sometime in the 70s, in the bible belt down south, by people who were just generally uncomfortable at the idea of a bunch of men hanging out with each other and playing make-believe. But I don’t care. I don’t *care* where the rumours were started. I’m sure that every pastime out there that isn’t theological study or hymn sings have been called ‘the devil’s game’.

I used to just laugh at people who spouted crap like this, then I went through a phase where I figured they just didn’t understand the game and tried to explain it to them, in the mistaken view that if someone understands something, they will change their mind about it (this is so very rarely the case). Eventually, I just kind of resigned myself to swearing and muttering under my breath for a while. If in public and confronted with this kind of statement, I still laugh out loud. Because it’s ridiculous. It’s RIDICULOUS.

Trust me, if I was worshipping some dark and eldritch god or demon in my basement, I wouldn’t be chatting about it nonchalantly with my children’s friends.

…okay, I *might*…but that’s not the point.

So then The Captain said, “you know, I don’t know if he really believes that or not. I think he just doesn’t want to play and doesn’t really want to say it.”

And fine. Fair enough.

And really, ultimately, if you think a roleplaying game is against your religion, you probably misunderstand your own religion’s doctrines and liturgies. I’ve studied comparative religion, and for much of my life have followed established religion (not just Christianity, either). I’ve never really understood the fear that some people have of fiction and gaming, particularly as it refers to their religion, but I also don’t care very much. It is they who are missing out, not me. I’m certainly not going to call this kid’s family up and try to disavow them of their mistaken opinion. Particularly since this is the same kid who one day announced to me that, and I am quoting, “gay is wrong because the bible says it’s wrong.”

In that case, he was right in front of me, and I said, “well, I know there are some people who think that way, and that’s unfortunate, because gay is no more wrong than having blonde hair or liking sports. The bible also says it’s wrong to eat bacon, fish, and lobster, and to wear the clothes you’re wearing right now. I don’t want to be too heavy-handed, here, but I won’t have that kind of language in my house. If you choose to believe that homosexuality is wrong, that’s your prerogative, but spouting uninformed opinions like that in my house will simply not do.” I didn’t get a call from his parents. I thought I would, but I didn’t. I’d have been glad to tell them exactly why I’d said it, too.

This isn’t about Christianity being wrong or right, and I don’t want to hear that BS. This isn’t about religious people being bad or stupid, and I won’t hear that BS either. This is about what comes next, and it pertains just to this one family:

They have no problem letting their kids play über violent computer games and watch completely inappropriate horror movies. Zombie movies that scared the bejeezus out of 8 year old The Captain? No problem. Pornographic images on the iPod at school in grade 4? No problem. Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto for 9 year olds? While 4 year olds watch? Not a problem. D&D? CALL THE MORALITY POLICE!

Let’s be clear: I don’t care what you believe in or don’t believe in. I think you’re doing a huge disservice to the rest of the world when you teach your kids things like ‘homosexuality is wrong’, regardless of how you justify that belief. And honestly, I have friends who don’t let their kids play RPGs OR video games. Like, any video games. They also don’t let their kids watch TV. For a variety of reasons.

But this one really stuck in my craw. Just the blatant hypocrisy of it. It’s okay to objectify people as sex objects, and it’s okay to objectify people as targets for aggression and violence, and it’s okay to glorify violence and wanton murder, but it’s somehow amoral or wrong to play a goddamned tabletop roleplaying game?

I mean, I kind of want to ask where in the bible it says “thou shalt not roll polyhedral dice and pretend to be a different character”. Because then I think I’ll probably hear something about false idols and worshipping other gods, and then I’ll be all, “how many hours a day do your kids spend at church versus in front of a screen?” Yeah. That’s what I thought.

Lord Love a Duck

Gram and cenobyte selling lemonade in front of Mum's first car.

Gram and cenobyte selling lemonade in front of Mum’s first car.

Did I ever tell you about the time my Gram and her neighbour took me for a drive in their small town in the 80s, and we saw a Young Man wearing Very Tight Trousers, and my Gram, who was usually so proper and reserved, said “Gol, if he passed wind, he’d split those trousers right in half!”? I thought I was going to die.

Or the time NOBODY believed me about the litany of foodstuffs Gram would offer if you even thought about considering a visit, until we had a game event and Gram drove into the middle of the yard and leapt out of the car offering fried chicken to everyone? Or perhaps a tomato sandwich?

Then there was the time my Gram bought my father a dildo from Consumers Distributing?

Probably.

While I didn’t always see eye-to-eye with my Gram, she did some pretty amazing stuff. Her family was a family of means until the Great Depression, when my great Grandfather lost everything by offering farmers credit on the bills they owed him. They survived the dust bowl, and my Gram, rather than doing what was expected of her (getting married and turning out as many kids as possible in hopes that some would survive), she instead found whatever work she could, taking in laundry and working at shops to earn an income. When she did marry a just-starting-out farmer, she had my father, and returned to work. She had a 30 year career working at the bank in her town. She did what most women in the 40s and 50s would not do.

She survived the Depression, the war years, small town gossip, two husbands, one daughter-in-law, three of five siblings, and the madness of the 20th century.

There’s no denying that she’s a bit of an odd old bird, my Gram.

My mother treated her terribly, which is something I’m ashamed of.

She had the most amazing laugh – when Gram got going, no one within earshot could help themselves; we all dissolved into fits of belly laughs, until there wasn’t a dry eye in the house.

There are times I will miss her. Most of her 87 years were good ones, she told me a few weeks ago. “When I go,” she said, “I won’t have any regrets. I’ll know I lived a blessed life.”

You did at that, Gram. You lived a blessed life. Ain’t nobody in the hereafter going hungry with you there.

To Be or Not To Be

What Shakespeare was talking about in the famous soliloquy from “Hamlet” was not all about whether it’s better to end your life or to continue to endure pain and heartbreak. It was not an extended existential whinge. It was, rather, a contemplation on whether or not to use the plural or the singular third person verb form of the infinitive “to be”. It’s a difficult question, with a relatively simple answer.

“To be” is one of the weirdest verbs in the English language. It does all kinds of fancy footwork, like a set of twins conjoined at the hip dancing salsa. It’s the sort of verb that makes high school students weep. Grade two kids just get it without questioning, but grade two kids are usually smarter than teenagers.

Anyway, here’s the rough rule of thumb:

If the subject of your sentence (the person, place, or thing that you are talking about) is *singular* in nature, then use “is”. If the subject of your sentence is plural, then use “are”.

F’rinstance: “There are many solutions to this problem.”

I can parse that sentence for you completely if you’d like, but suffice it to say for now that ‘solutions’ is the subject of the sentence and ‘problem’ is the object of the sentence. “There are” is the form of the verb in question.

F’rinstance: “There is one solution to this problem.”

Again, using the same subject/object (solutions-solution/problem), it is evident that because ‘solution’ is singular, we use “is”.

I mention this because I saw an entire article in the newspaper this morning in which not only the interviewee used the verb wrong, but the *reporter* used the incorrect tense. Regina Leader-Post, where are your editors? This is a very simple solution that any copy editor would catch immediately. Call me.

——

Also, as an unrelated note, I dreamed that Carl, Brennan, and Viper Pilot showed up to a nightclub at which I was dancing like nobody was watching (nobody was; the place had just opened). I burst into tears when I saw Viper Pilot. I do hope he comes for a visit soon. I miss him like all kinds of crazy.

Pimpin’

Okay. So this is happening. It’s a play, and I’m in it:

WBweb

But ‘cept tickets for Friday the 19th weren’t selling fast enough, so that show’s been cancelled. But I’d like to invite you to the play. I’d forgotten how much I missed this stuff.

If you need more incentive than “cenobyte is in a play”, the proceeds from this play are split between the drama club and the local preschool (which is a wicked cool preschool, by the way). We need to completely sell out at least one night (160 tickets) to break even. So. Um. Ring those phones. And whatnot.

But seriously, I would really love it if you’d come to the play. I did it just for you…

Ask me

BeachI have a question for you.

Here is the preamble: people are, in general, awesome. Most people in the world are lovley, caring, giving humans. They want to share; they want to help. We’re conditioned to look for the bad bits, but if you switch that over to ‘look for the good bits’, your whole world can change. It sounds trite, I suppose. But I think it makes a difference. When you find yourself mentioning negatives, make a conscious effort to find positives. It changes entire conversations.

I should note that the preamble has very little to do with the actual question.

The question is this:

Do you think we must experience something before we are “able to” comment about it or form an opinion about it.

As an example, I often hear men say: “I will never be faced with the decision to abort a foetus, so I don’t feel like I get to have a say in the abortion debate.” (I think that’s Bee Ess, but it’s something I hear quite frequently.)

I sometimes hear people say things along the lines of “that doesn’t apply to me, therefore I can not (or do not) have an opinion about it.”

I’m not talking about abortion specifically. I’m asking if you think you must have first-hand, direct experience with something before you are “allowed” (for lack of a better term) to have an opinion about it?