Miss Interpretation

I think I did something Wrong.

The Captain has had buddies over this week; he has friends whose company I quite enjoy….and he has friends whose company I find trying. I would be surprised if it were otherwise, to be honest. He has a couple of friends who, I’m sure, will come into their own when they’re older…they’ll grow into their egos, I suppose. Or grow out of them. But, for the most part, the friends that The Captain has are pretty awesome.

Usually, when The Captain has friends over, the rule is that they’re welcome to play outside or in The Captain’s room, but they’re not going to park their butts in front of screens all day. I’m Very Mean that way. So on the way upstairs, the kids often try to sneak in a few glimpse of whatever judge show happens to be on at the moment.

One time, a “paid political advertisement” of Jack Layton came on, and one of The Captain’s friends said, “oh, I HATE Jack Layton!”

The Captain gaped at the kid, and I asked “Why?”

“Because he wants to make it legal to be gay,” The Captain’s friend said.

I admit it, I laughed out loud. “He’s a bit late for that,” I said. “It hasn’t been illegal to be gay for over forty years in this country. I don’t think Jack Layton wants to tell people who they can or cannot love. But what’s wrong with being gay?” I asked.

I didn’t really think ‘cenobyte, it’s really not your place to be engaging children in discussions about homosexuality.’ I didn’t really think ‘this kid’s parents could get really mad at you if you go much further with this discussion’. I didn’t really think ‘you don’t have the right to teach morality to other people’s children’. I just asked a question.

The Captain’s friend said, “because God forbids it!”

At this point, I *did* recognise that launching into an extensive theological debate would probably not be beneficial, so I simply tried my best to mask my shock and surprise, and said, “Ah. That’s not how we believe, but I respect that you and your family may have different opinions on the matter. Many people think many different things about that, like my friend who is a priest who is gay, or my other friend who is a minister and is gay.”

The Captain’s friend said, “Really?”

And I said, “Yes. I believe that it doesn’t matter who you love, as long as you do. Love, that is. The world needs more love in it.”

The Captain’s friend said, “Good point.”

And I said, “There are political parties whose representatives believe otherwise, and there are people who agree with them, and there’s nothing wrong with having a different opinion. But Jack Layton is not particularly interested in what people do with their own private parts, nor with who they love. He’s more concerned that Canadian people have adequate living conditions and things like that.”

The Captain’s friend thought for a moment, and then said, “yeah, you know, it doesn’t really make sense to tell people who they can or can’t love.”

It wasn’t until much, much later that I thought perhaps I had overstepped my bounds. And then I thought, well, I’d have said the same thing to Kid’s parents. Or my local MP (not that he’d hear it). Or my priest, or my kids’ teachers, or pretty much anybody who said that homosexuality should be illegal and that God forbids it. But there’s a part of me that’s a bit worried that I’ll get A Call from Kid’s parents wherein they are Quite Upset that I’ve been filling their child’s head with Communist/Hippie Nonsense.

I’m not *especially* worried about receiving That Call. I’ve been rehearsing for That Call for years.

What’s more bothersome to me is that although Canada is in the leading three countries when it comes to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) rights *in the entire world*, some people think this is a Bad Thing. What’s bothersome to me is that people think that homosexual acts should be illegal, a mindset which was overruled by most first-world democratic countries in the 60s. What’s bothersome to me is that there are people using God and religion to excuse their intolerance  fear hate closed-minded bigotry. What’s bothersome to me is that clearly there are people interested in politics who cannot find unbiased information, or who don’t know where to start. What’s bothersome is that *they’re just wrong*.

In other news, what the hell is so threatening/frightening about socialism? Someone told me it’s because socialism is the next step/near step to communism, which it isn’t. Socialism and communism are opposites, really. But I’ve discovered that Republicans and other Conservative types tend to get this mixed up.

  10 comments for “Miss Interpretation

  1. Stark Raving Dad
    29 April 2011 at 9:55 am

    Have I told you lately that I love you?

    It’s OK, my wife loves you too.

  2. mrgod2u
    29 April 2011 at 10:21 am

    If any parents have a problem with what their kid hears in YOUR house, then they should not allow their kid in YOUR house. If they call you up to express their opinions about your right to speak however you want in YOUR house you should tell them where they can stuff their bigotry in the privacy of THEIR house.

    • 29 April 2011 at 11:07 am

      Good point.

      Although I do worry that MY views in MY house might affect how The Captain’s friends get to interact with HIM. You know? Like, if his friends’ parents tell his friends that they can’t play with him because The Captain’s parents are faggot-lovers (snicker)…I just don’t want The Captain to have to deal with any more problems than he’s already going to have to.

  3. BensonBot
    30 April 2011 at 8:16 pm

    Yeah…
    My GAY LOVER and have talked about the Gay Marriage thing, and had decided that if that stinkbot Harper had tried to make it a campaign issue we would get teh hitched the next day. While we were *still allowed to*. (I know, sounds far-fetched right? Right? … But I wouldn’t put it past him if he thought it would get him votes… And his speech-writer has been a fierce um, anti-advocate of the Gay Marriage.)

    • 1 May 2011 at 1:10 am

      By “anti-advocate”, do you mean douche bag?

      • BensonBot
        1 May 2011 at 1:12 pm

        Yes/No.
        He has not been ‘a fierce douchebag *for* Gay Marriage’, yet he has certainly been a douchebag…

        • 1 May 2011 at 1:33 pm

          I see.

          Well, at least you don’t have the guy who’s said that “there are two types of people; the A types and the B types. We’re the A people. The B people are homosexual faggots with dirt on their fingernails who carry diseases”.

          (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwumZ5I6vkM)

          I’m *pretty sure* ol’ Tom doesn’t support gay marriage.

          • BensonBot
            1 May 2011 at 1:41 pm

            Wow.
            Two thoughts on this:
            1) “Homosexual faggots”: are there such things as ‘heterosexual faggots’?; and
            2) He could totally be, in actuality, a Kids in the Hall character being cleverly played by someone else.

            • 1 May 2011 at 1:43 pm

              1) GET OUT OF MY HEAD! I was *just thinking that*

              2) Very, VERY cleverly played. So clever as to have received, and won, a seat in parliament as a cockbite homophobic jerk. Or, in layman’s terms, hater of homosexual faggots. AND heterosexual faggots.

i make squee noises when you tell me stuff.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE
%d bloggers like this: